In the realm of investing, it is easy to get lost in the pursuit of a "perfect system." This obsession resembles a futile quest for a perpetual motion machineThe more complex systems become, the further they drift from the essence of investingWith time, seasoned investors often discover that simple and straightforward methodologies that strike at the core of their beliefs are far more reliableWhat holds the most significance is a broader vision and strategic success, rather than the minutiae of intricate systems.

For many investors, an early and dangerous misconception is that they possess the "truth." This is compounded if one tends to be either bored or competitive, leading to hostility towards those with differing viewpointsThis mentality often indicates a stagnation in growthWhile it is true that investing adheres to immutable foundational principles, the weights of various factors cannot be defined by any "sacred model." This should not be construed as capriciousness; rather, it reflects an ability to maintain an open mind in the face of ongoing learning.

Numerous factors influence the decision-making process in investing, yet three critical points can be distilled: 1. A sense of the bigger picture—understanding one's position in the broader market cycle and whether one should feel fear, greed, or numbness; 2. Value judgment—placing bets on entities that promise future advantages and cultivating patience; 3. Awareness of expectation discrepancies—being sensitive to assumptions in value judgments and valuations during moments of significant divergence.

Investing mythology is often full of tales depicting invincibility, but the reality is stark

Advertisements

Even renowned investors like Warren Buffett acknowledge their continuous mistakesThe crucial question arises: why do some investors face catastrophic losses when they err while others do not suffer severe consequences? The differences lie in three main areas: firstly, whether they own their fallibility; secondly, whether they effectively safeguard themselves through margins of safety; and thirdly, whether they diversify their risks sufficiently to compensate for poor oddsConsequently, losses stem from mismanaging the preconditions of errors.

Take the equation PB = PE × ROE as a starting pointIf ROE stands at 8%, a PE ratio of 35 results in a PB of only 2.8. Conversely, if a company sustains growth and ROE increases to 25%, even at a PE of 25, the PB escalates to 6.25.

This illustrates how PE reflects premium expectations, while PB indicates asset premiums

Advertisements

Generally, the anticipation around expected performance manifests far earlier than actual shifts in ROE, with PB displaying relative synchronization or lagging behind ROE changes.

Examining this further reveals that the tendency of ROE itself is a pivotal factor in valuationThe crux of valuation involves not merely basic arithmetic on metrics but foresight into a company’s future profitability and the ability to accurately appraise its operational phaseThe concept of "fuzzy correctness" surfaces here, where specific metrics like PE and PB may hold ambiguity (or allow for targeted analysis), but the trend of ROE demands precision in judgment.

A high ROE exemplifies a company's profitability, with sustainable high ROE indicating significant competitive advantageIn most scenarios, the market tends to award a capital premium, i.e., a higher PB for strong companies

Advertisements

However, should a high ROE company display a low PB, one might wonder: why? Possible reasons include: 1. The market's irrationality; 2. The company being highly cyclical and perched at a profit peakSuch a contradiction can occur sporadically, yet, generally speaking, high ROE and low PB are fundamentally at odds.

In investing, "dancing with shackles" may not signify confinement but could instead represent a mechanism of protectionFor instance, Warren Buffett's philosophy of "only making twenty holes" or the common practice of consistently investing in index funds showcase that what seems to be a severe limitation may, over time, transform into a gilded braceletThis paradigm also explains why many individuals fail to outperform their own hypothetical portfolios.

Companies capable of continually generating new expectations tend to attract favorable market attention

• Analysis of the U.S. January Employment Report
• Basis, Rate Hikes, and Market Segmentation
• Creating a Profitable Trading System
• The Impact of a Stronger Dollar
• BYD Stock Soars 20%

However, two distinctive scenarios emerge: one where new expectations revolve around core business enhancement or supply chain upgrades—with promises made genuinely fulfilled—indicative of exceptional companies; the other is characterized by lofty and shifting expectations, constantly masking unachieved old promises, representative of unreliable or even fraudulent businesses.

In the relative relationship between company value and price, purchasing a company at a static high price isn’t necessarily catastrophic, especially if it continues to grow cheaper moving forward, thus allowing for potentially favorable investmentsThe true danger lies in acquiring shares at a bargain price, only for them to become ever more expensive, indicating that the rationale for buying was fundamentally flawedIn such cases, the ability to correct errors swiftly becomes paramount; otherwise, the costs of allowing mistakes to solidify may become unbearably high.

Companies characterized by efficient operations may initially appear devoid of tangible barriers to entry

However, this efficiency can evolve to form substantial high barriers rooted in factors such as scale, technological advantages, and customer loyalty, often only becoming apparent as the company nears its maturation phaseIn this context, during its early to mid-stage, it is crucial for such firms to focus on: 1. Long-term demand expansion; 2. A dedicated, aspirational team within the industry; 3. A relentless and proven track record of follow-through.

The bravery and responsibilities of intellectuals manifest not in criticizing their peers but rather in confronting authority and populismYet, those who tread this path often find themselves at odds with both sides, lacking the favor of power while failing to win the approval of the masses—doomed to remain outside the spotlightIt is far simpler to appease the public in investment, denouncing systemic failures during downturns, only to exuberantly proclaim victories in bull markets while projecting oneself as the parasite of virtue.

To master the art of value investing, one should refrain from rote memorization of Buffett’s maxims

For aspiring entrepreneurs, obsessively studying success stories is ill-advisedInstead, the most valuable lesson comes from meticulously researching the avenues of failureA person who fails to analyze various cases of defeats cannot expect success; those who repeatedly assure you that "doing A leads to success" are either idealists or frauds.

One text articulates: "Mediocre generals tend to drown in the multitude of problems and uncertainties, struggling to find direction, while true strategists cut through the chaos, discerning the crux of situations with swiftness and resolve." This analogy parallels investment decisions; adept investors skillfully identify major conflicts, perceiving the whole from details, culminating in decisive "logic pivots."

Examining the same company under diverse ratios reveals varying weights of importance

When the price is incredibly low, the focus shifts to understanding market concerns and potential worst-case scenarios, emphasizing adequate oddsIn contrast, at reasonable pricing, short-term information is refined, underscoring who can see further ahead, with the core being sustainability in growth; at extremely high pricing, every minuscule probability event should not be overlookedThus, extremes underscore a battle of perspectives, while the norm relies on depth.

From an assessment standpoint, it is not the overpriced assets that cause concern for many individuals, but rather the difficulty in gauging valueDifficulties in valuation stem either from excessive variables or the straying too far beyond capacity limitsFurthermore, one should fear not merely purchasing at below market value, but the traps that can stem from such illusionsIf other factors remain relatively certain, "overpricing" narrows down to a straightforward issue, at least in terms of measure

However, if critical valuation assumptions prove indefinable or are revoked, then issues compound severely.

Within market landscapes, many individuals dread extremes due to their sheer intensityYet, for professionals, true extremes often become manageable due to the price-value divide and the law of mean reversion, leading to clarity in decision-makingIn contrast, ambiguous market conditions—facing diverging paths or convoluted progressions—pose challenges in securing optimal choices, with a middle-ground stance often appearing more plausible.

In the world of investing, dedication often yields fruits over time; effort typically guarantees a returnNevertheless, the cruel and stark reality of investment lies in its disregard for contributions while solely acknowledging right or wrong outcomesIn this profession, diligence takes a backseat, while proper values and methodologies lead the way

Otherwise, incorrect trajectories magnify struggles; obsession with minutiae can lead to madness.

Luck plays a distinct role in the investing sphereMany novices appear fortunate due to serendipity, while seasoned investors seem to derive luck through consistent correctness in choicesThe former relies on randomness and passivity; the latter employs high probabilities and active engagementA person celebrating commendable investment results once or twice may find such victories commonplace, but sustained fortuity results from an inherent "ability" to attract luckRecognizing the divergence between skill and luck is a hallmark of matured investors.

Recently, a friend inquired about the pursuit of a career in investingThe truth is, pursuing investment as a profession is a high-stakes choice, with a notably high elimination rate during the initial stages

It matters little whether one is a professional or an amateur; what truly counts is the depth of knowledgeAdditionally, beginning a career in investing during a bear market allows individuals to assess their capabilities rationally amidst tough circumstancesIf one cannot withstand the pressure, it signifies a lack of suitability; if one perseveres, then it’s crucial to contemplate continuing this endeavor.

It’s often said that a man fears being in the wrong professionSo what constitutes a good industry? A straightforward indicator lies in the prevalence of middle-aged and older individuals occupying roles during their peak professional years, suggesting a reliable industry for lifelong engagementConversely, industries that seem dazzling yet consist mainly of transient youth typically lack permanence for anyone over 35—an indication that a career change may be necessary.

The risk of inaction becomes increasingly daunting with time, while significant, irreversible capital losses pose the gravest dangers

Fluctuations constitute the most frequent, manageable risksThe first type of risk arises from cognitive dissonance, the second from reckless confidence, and the third from natural lawsFor professional investors, it is vital to wholly circumvent the first two risks while remaining at peace with the thirdCompensating for the unavoidable uncertainties requires perspicacity and an anti-fragile mindset.

Learning and evolving within investment is an arduous journey; moving from mere observation to true understanding necessitates grappling with concepts until forms of realization manifestYears ago, I discerned that the essence of investing distilled into "subject, timing, and intensity"; yet, achieving equilibrium between these often conflicting components took an exhausting 3-4 yearsOver time, individuals come to realize that thriving in investment demands both innate talent and considerable effort, occasionally complemented by good fortune.

Now, my unease arises not from two years without profits, but from two years devoid of personal growth

A failure to gain insight indicates not an exhaustion of truth but rather signs of complacency, sluggishness, laziness, or worse, obstinacyThe beauty of investing lies in the ability to earn while standing or even lying back, but its cruelty is the persistent existence of a singular cascading failure probabilityA commitment to continuous progress serves as the strongest bulwark against ruin.

The path to adept investing teaches that reasoning often takes a backseat to lessons drawn from experience; these, in turn, hold more significance than mere thought or counselMoreover, a great mentor must embody traits of good character, which is often supplemented by a smidgeon of luckSo, which aspect do you believe you struggle with the most? Most people lament the absence of great mentors, seldom recognizing where they still need to cultivate their character.

Character—essentially, investment personality—embodies admirable qualities such as rationality, dialectic thinking, moderation, and intrinsic strengths

Concerning mentors, they are not lacking; endless investment classics and numerous online case studies of prominent investors abound, allowing for ample opportunities for learningFurthermore, it’s worth considering whether any esteemed investor relied wholly on a mentor's unwavering guidance throughout their career.

Height, depth, and perspective exemplify three core tendencies in fundamental investment stylesHeightened perspectives emphasize broad opportunities, focusing on long-term patterns for systematic strategic ventures; depth caters to individual companies with profound research and enduring value assessment, aiming for collaborative growth with high-quality enterprises; perspective-based styles prioritize individual analysis yet pivot on tangents from market expectations versus corporate valuation, capturing the moments of market correction.

In the investment arena, seizing one significant opportunity bears far more weight than countless small mishaps

In any given era, individuals typically confront similar opportunities; the crux lies in their discernmentGrasping a sizable chance can alter one's fortunes; two such seizures can herald new life paths; three may redefine a family's legacyHistorical patterns of the A-share market suggest that substantial opportunities arise roughly every 3-5 years, but innumerable individuals waste time on minor distractions.

However, the capacity to recognize grand opportunities necessitates ample preparatory groundworkIn essence, neglecting learning today drastically reduces one's chances of leveraging future opportunities in two yearsProgressing inadequately across five years typically results in witnessing adept individuals scale multiple rungs of success while remaining mere observersWhile life appears long, the genuine window for learning and translating that knowledge into tangible investment outcomes is surprisingly brief—spanning merely a decade

Missing this golden opportunity for wealth realization often dawns late in recognition.

Opportunities split into two categories: one where individuals grow alongside monumental trends, such as real estate over the past decade; profits, viewed year by year, yield modest returns, yet remarkable gains arise from patiently awaiting time; the other entails seizing opportunities amidst crises, taking advantage of public fears and greedThe former necessitates a keen foresight and extensive vision; the latter demands intuitive awareness of risk juxtaposed with opportunityBoth require immense resolve and sustained patience.

If anything is worse than being driven by greed, it is the fear of being pushed forwardEach bubble begins rooted in value, morphs into blind optimism and greed, with latecomers often motivated by fears of "missing out." Although the final phases of bubbles can favor immense returns, capitalizing on them requires adeptly cashing out at the peak.

The essence of expenditure begins with discerning consumption from investment

If it is consumption, the cost becomes inconsequential, motivated either by abundance or the priceless pursuit of happiness—an evaluation solely based on economic efficacyHowever, when it pertains to investment, the framing simplifies to assessing risks versus rewards, evaluating investment timelines, opportunity costs of alternatives, the sensibility of diverse asset allocations, and resilience against unexpected risks—all critical to achieving mid-to-long-term financial goalsFailing to grasp these elements signifies an inability to graduate from financial kindergarten.

Investment is fraught with paradoxes: market efficiency dictates that known information rapidly influences prices; however, to outperform the market, decisions necessitate timing that anticipates shifts before information crystallizes, sustaining high victory ratesIs this feasible? I believe it is, though not easily achieved—it demands astute commercial insight, the capacity to synthesize fragmented fundamental data, alongside sound judgment regarding market probabilities.

Evaluating specific difficulties shows they rise in tandem with demands for excessive returns

Should you impose an unforgiving timeframe for surplus gains, that difficulty approaches infiniteConversely, maintaining a calm demeanor allows for moderation while preserving high success rates and significantly reducing decision-making hurdlesYet, maintaining calmness itself manifests as a profound challenge.

Accurate predictions regarding asset price movements remain elusive; however, making decisions aligned with long-term interests is feasibleThe goal is to side with probability and common sense—avoiding dangerous scenarios; next, devise mid and long-term strategies to fortify positions for victory, incurring minimal costs primarily in time investments; lastly, learn to prioritizeShort-term gains should yield to long-term objectives, while tactical maneuvers should align with strategic visions, and profitability should conform to risk management principles

This encapsulates the tenets of a victor.

Embrace reverse thinking to design the perfect plan for self-sabotageSpiritually, ensure a state of ignorance while blissfully unaware of itIdeally, nurture doses of stubbornness, restlessness, or competitive spirit; reluctance to recognize mistakes marks the zenith of self-destructive tendenciesEnsure to gamble—especially when leveraging; select the hottest assets at their valuation peaks and ultimate performance highsMost importantly, never admit to faults—when you fall, lie still.

When things go well, it is easy to lose one’s grounding, particularly for investors enjoying a run of successThis often breeds disdain for those in less fortunate positions, along with harsh wordsHowever, this isn’t self-confidence; it’s superficialityInvestors should always accommodate anticipations for personal downturns—not pretense, but an organic reflection based on comprehensive investment histories and a deeper understanding of investing's essence

Humility toward the markets may not guarantee success, but arrogance guarantees failure.

The phrase “The market is efficient” varies drastically in meaning from “The market is correct.” While efficiency denotes the notion that most information efficiently reflects in market prices, correctness assumes the market accurately integrates all data to deliver precise valuationsAcknowledging market efficiency exists alongside the reality that it might not always be correct is crucial in understanding investment.

Should the market indeed be consistently correct, investors would find themselves nearly redundantYet, acknowledging market efficiency asserts that the intrinsic value will rarely stray from price, offering anchors for investments; while in medium-to-short timelines, effective engagement incorporates fundamental dynamics, uncertainties, and sentiment—which can unveil distortions as opportunities for investment.

Drilling down further, firmly efficient markets exhibit relative calmness while presenting lower chances for opportunity realization; inversely, inefficient markets entail greater volatility, amplifying chances for opportunity

For the former, selective investment targets hold prominence, while timing holds weight for the latter; succeeding in robust markets often proves resilient, while weak ones challenge preservation strategies.

To thrive and endure in the investment landscape, one must develop an innate sense of risk and an acute intuition for opportunityPossessing an intuitive grasp of potential hazards forms the foundation of longevity—if one retains insight into risk dynamics, survival becomes easierComplementing this awareness with a knack for spotting substantial opportunities ensures a prosperous journey in the world of investmentUltimately, both concepts reflect our handling of uncertainty, requiring an understanding of the world’s complexities and one's limitations to build effective management strategies.

Delving into the literature of investment luminaries reveals that even these rational giants take deliberate steps to construct barriers against market noise

Their strategies range from selecting serene work environments and meticulously minimizing the accessibility of market data to engaging in soul-soothing activities outside the market sphereConversely, as inexperienced investors often mistakenly believe that unrelenting scrutiny will yield success, they equate multitasking across multiple monitors as hallmarks of expertise—a comparison that starkly highlights the severity of such misconceptions.

At its core, investing relies upon sound judgmentTo maintain capable judgment, one requires a relaxed state of beingThoughts can become convoluted when preoccupied with fleeting stakes, often yielding only fatigue and anxietyLearning to pivot focus away from immediate market concerns could yield impressive insights that arise from unwinding one’s mind in more tranquil settings.

Ultimately, the aspiration of investment education culminates in attaining a domain of "freedom." At this point, one integrates various schools of thought, navigates the labyrinth of personal struggles, and eventually synthesizes disparate knowledge into a coherent understanding

What once seemed contradictory among various expert opinions converges into a singular, unified perspective, simplifying previously complex investment matrices into straightforward input-output structures—indicating that one has indeed embraced newfound freedom.

Market volatility does not inherently equate to elevated risks; similarly, tranquility does not suggest equilibriumThe nature of calmness and turbulence varies across contexts—daily fluctuations may appear muted when observed over longer durationsThe distinction between stability and imbalance relies less on transient waves and more on the divergence between price and inherent valueIn essence, volatility reflects emotional scale, while price-value discrepancies dictate longer-term trajectories.

Life and investment share numerous parallels; both inherently bear unpredictability but can employ strategies to enhance long-term success rates

Understanding the essence of crucial don’ts often outweighs merely discerning optimal actionsFew pivotal judgments can define the course of an entire life; time invariably smooths the inequities of serendipitous occurrences, rendering outcomes largely equitableChoices shape altitude, while affiliations govern difficulty; the most lamentable scenario remains discovering meaningful choices just as they slip behind the clouds.

For the youth, vibrance prevails; as one approaches middle age, clarity outweighs excitement in importanceRegrettably, those with radiant youth rarely strike paths of clarity, as they often bear concerns contrary to what warrants them; conversely, individuals in their middle years venture with even less clarityUnderstanding the essence of "vibrance" becomes scarce, as authentic introspection becomes a rarity seldom achievedOne's path does not necessitate seeking the affection of others but should be rooted in a solid sense of personal conviction